Pramila Krishnan
Desalination plant affects fishermen
Chennai: Environmentalists
and residents living next to the Chennai Metro Water Supply and
Sewerage Board’s (CMWSSB) desalination plant at Nemmeli, 35 km from the
city, complain that their quality of life has declined greatly ever
since the Board decided to more than double its production to supply
water to households.
The
plant, which started functioning in February, has a capacity of 100
million litres per day (mld) which the Water Board authorities aim to
increase to 250 mld. R.
Masilamani, 53, is one of many aggrieved fishermen who points to the
problems. Their catch of fish, their staple food, has reduced.
“Our
ice plant, community hall and a few houses close to the shore, have
fallen down. We are witnessing a disaster in our village now,” he says,
adding that the plant was releasing brine on to the ocean bed. When he
and 19 other fishermen protested about this, they were put in prison for
a month in May.
Green activist Nithyanand
Jayaraman, who works on coastal zone protection projects, says that the
plant is neither economically nor environmentally viable. “Desalination
plants are mainly operated in countries like Saudi Arabia and Israel
where fresh water resources are scarce. Instead of conserving the local
water bodies and aquifers, we continue to invest in desalination plants
which are not viable.”
He says that the beach area
in Nemmeli had already been eroded and the residue from the plant’s
overflow pipe had killed marine life. His question is to do with why
marine livelihoods were being sacrificed for desalination when the
government could take other steps to conserve water bodies in Chennai.
Desalination
plant Superintending Engineer C.R.Yogeshwaran said that the water was
drawn one km from the sea and the residue released 600 m away from the
shore. “Residue will become normal sea water before it reaches the top
layer of the sea,” he explains.
Erosion had been
arrested and initiatives were on to control environmental damage, he
adds. According to a top official, the environment impact assessment
study was conducted before commissioning the plant.
Multipronged plan needed to tackle city water woes
The
government can solve the city’s water woes by first fixing its leaky
pipelines, improving rain water harvesting systems and raising the water
tariff rather than allotting vast sums of money to new water supply
projects. This is the conclusion that Ph.D. scholar Veena Srinivasan has
made after doing five years of research on Chennai’s water crisis at
Stanford University, USA.
The research
included, groundwork, such as interacting with the residents of Chennai,
tanker operators, government officials and documenting the water supply
and drought hit areas in Chennai. Veena has explored scenarios of what
the city’s water supply may look like in 2025, using reasonable
projections of population, land use and income growth.
Speaking
to DC over the phone she said, “While the rich are allowed to draw
unlimited amounts of water as they have a sump facility at home, poor
families which live without a pipe connection are forced to buy water
from private firms or to wait in line to fill their pots whenever the
metro tankers arrive.
Water should be metered and
the poor provided water at hugely subsidised rates.” She said that good
quality water should be supplied for drinking, cooking and dish-washing
while low-quality water or ground water could be utilised for
non-potable needs.
Talking about desalination
plants, she said, “Leave alone the environmental degradation they cause
to the marine ecosystem, the government has to pump in huge sums of
money for their continuous operation. It is more expensive than any
other existing water supply models operated in the city.”
Pointing
out that leakage of water in the pipelines was estimated to be between
15 and 35 per cent depending on the zone, she said, “Most developing
world cities suffer from pipeline losses as high as 50 per cent compared
to as low as 5 per cent in the world’s best run utilities. Unless the
leakages are fixed, efficient water supply would continue to be
unachievable for the government.”
Though rain
water harvesting was laudable, she said that the system remained as
enhanced aquifer recharge rather than a collection of rain water in
cisterns for end use. “Without harvesting, only an estimated 9 per cent
of rain water in Chennai makes it to the aquifer; the rest runs off into
the ocean,” she pointed out.
She reiterated that
the way out for Chennai was to adopt a multi-pronged strategy involving
raising water rates, repairing pipes harvesting the rain water.
No comments:
Post a Comment